Gay and lesbian couples are often concerned that their “non-traditional family” will be a disadvantage in custody decisions. While technically this issue is never to be determinative of custody disputes, lest t
he Court violate the Equal Protection Clause, many gay and lesbian couples feel that their sexual orientation played a role in the ultimate disposition of the Court. Putting aside potential biases of certain judges, there is at least one case that seems to lend credence to those concerns. In 2008, the Second Appellant District in Clark County decided a case by the name of Page v. Page in which the Court specifically stated that a homosexual relationship of a mother caused adverse affects to the minor children and warranted a change of custody from that mother to the father. The facts of that case can be summarized as follows:
Four years after the mother was designated the residential parent of both children, the father filed a motion to modify the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities. The common pleas trial Court granted the father’s motion and awarded him custody. The appellate court held that the common pleas court did not err in finding that a change of circumstances occurred as there was evidence that, as a collateral result of the mother’s relationship with her same-sex partner, both children had experienced personality disorders, and therefore, modification of custody was in the children’s best interest. The court determined that the adverse collateral effects of the mother’s relationship with her partner and the partner’s role in the children’s lives showed little room for improvement in the future.
While the Court was careful to say that it was not basing its decision on the simple fact that the mother was a lesbian, but rather the collateral affects that her relationship had on the children, it should give pause to the gay and lesbian couples fighting for custody. This is something to keep an eye on in the future as more and more gay and lesbian couples fight for custody of one of the partner’s minor children.
Content brought to you by the law firm of Morrison & Nicholson
Related Posts
- Is there Joint Custody in Ohio for Divorcing Couples?
- Can I Increase Visitation With My Child As Opposed to Filing for Custody?
- What is the standard to request legal custody in Ohio?
- Children Services Home Studies When Custody Is an Issue
- Interim custody, attorney fees, spousal, and child support while a divorce case is pending in an Ohio Court
- Difference between Domestic Relations Court and Juvenile Court in Custody cases

2hot2touch Says:
June 26th, 2009 at 7:40 pmVisit 2hot2touch
Hey, thanks for this article! I just moved to Xenia, Ohio from Dora, Alabama and my partner and I would like to adopt. Does this case hurt our changes with adoptions? Any help that anyone can give would be fantastic. Thank you so much!
Sam Hasler Says:
June 28th, 2009 at 1:50 pmVisit Sam Hasler
What was the evidence that favored the non-custodial parent? Did they actually have a psychiatrist or other expert testimony?
Sarah Says:
July 8th, 2009 at 11:28 amVisit Sarah
I believe they aren’t disadvantaged. When children are raised with a father and mother, then forced through a divorce, and made to live with one parent whom is now living completely different confuses the child and messes them up. I agree with the courts decision and I hope they continue to look at long term affects on children from this situation. Its not the same as moving from one house to another or painting a room a different color. That is a complete “new” life change.